Issues

As America approaches its 250th anniversary and the 25th observance of the September 11 attacks, this piece asks a defining question: What kind of country should America be? It argues that today’s deepest conflicts reflect enduring tensions over liberty, responsibility, tradition, and fairness—and that America’s strength lies in debating those differences while remaining one nation.

As America approaches its 250th anniversary, this piece reframes the nation not as a melting pot, but as a cultural mosaic, where diverse perspectives strengthen, not divide. Drawing on "Symposium," it underscores a core idea: the ability to respectfully disagree is not a weakness of the American system, but one of its greatest strengths.

As the 25th anniversary of 9/11 approaches, the U.S. must confront the terrorist networks and state sponsors that enable extremism before early warning signs become the next national tragedy.

In an era obsessed with winning arguments and picking sides, we’ve lost sight of a more important question: not who is right, but what is right. Leaders as different as Jesse Jackson and Ronald Reagan understood that democracy only works when moral clarity matters more than partisan loyalty.

As the United States nears its 250th anniversary, we must confront how fear and stereotyping threaten the ideals we claim to uphold. Racial profiling erodes trust, weakens communities, and teaches future generations that justice is conditional. America’s strength has never been uniformity, but a shared commitment to fairness, dignity, and liberty for all.

Human trafficking at the U.S. southern border is not just a humanitarian crisis, it is a growing national security threat. As criminal networks exploit vulnerable migrants, they also create pathways that terrorists and bad actors can use to evade detection. Treating trafficking and border security as separate problems leaves Americans, and victims, at risk.

As the U.S. pivots to great-power rivalry, new fault lines in extremism, AI, and crime are forming. The next 9/11 may come from what we’re no longer watching.

Silence in the face of extremist language isn’t neutrality — it’s complicity. Why public officials must reject rhetoric tied to violence and hate.

An examination of rising antisemitism and global jihadist terrorism, the lessons of 9/11, and why memory is essential to preventing future attacks.